Keep it Real – Reflections on Learning so Deep that it hurts…but in a good way

On the plane heading back from #deeperlearning 2015, ruminating on that experience, thinking about the Book “Show your work” by Austin Kleon (thanks Ramsay Barnes) and looking back over the last couple of weeks of my students’ work.

A few thoughts on the Deeper Learning 2015 experience. (This was my third year going so I was one of the few “threequel” attendees). So many good things here, but maybe the focal point could be Rob Riordan’s (High Tech High’s “emperor of rigor”) reminder to us of Rob’s Rules of Rigor:
There is no rigor without –
• engagement
• ownership
• exemplars
• audiences
• purpose
• dreams
• FUN!

The conference experience typified this, with a powerful, engaging keynote on Day 1 from Chris Emdin (@chrisemdin) who delivered a thoughtful, energetic and passionate exploration of “Reality Pedagogy”. He pushed us to stay true to ourselves and our motivations that brought us to education and made a passionate case for meeting our students where they are at – as bright, motivated learners. A few quotes from his talk:

“The Masters Tools will never destroy the Master’s House”

“Ground Zero for Changing the world is teachers…dig deep and dig out!”

“You just can’t wake up and deem yourself culturally relevant.”

“If you say that education is the civil rights issue of our time, then you better teach it in a civil rights manner in your classroom!”

Wednesday Night we watched a film “Most likely to succeed” which looked at the education system historically and made the case the school transformation in deeper learning practices is the best way to prepare students for their future. It both looked wide at cognitive science and the facts around educational succeed, but also followed a few students at High Tech High through school year, documenting their challenges and successes in a real Deeper learning experience. MUST. SEE.

Thursday I ran a 4 1/2 hour deep dive based on our year long project investigating sustainable transportation through understand, designing and building electric bikes (a little more about that work below). I had 12 eager, talented and diverse colleagues (teachers and students!) and we spent the day exploring riding and designing around the bike experience. Their artifact presentation at the end of the day was exciting because it showed the diverse ways they approached deepening their understanding of this work. I am still collecting pictures of the day, but I am posting them here: https://flic.kr/s/aHsk9Uk3JT. The webpage that holds the resources the dive are here: https://sites.google.com/a/hightechhigh.org/dl2015materials/deep-dives

The real power of this meeting of the minds was just that – meeting, laughing, talking, sharing with like minded passionate practitioners with deliberate intent to understand and support our work together.

The work over the past couple of weeks in my classes points towards these rules of rigor. In MPX two projects are reaching their conclusion: the Math and Art project has been in the holding phase as I have been working toward getting permission to exhibit the student work on the exterior walls of the Hartley complex. Back when we designed this three building complex, we had planned to place provocative, fun engaging art and exhibits through it, but these items were cut from the budget and never brought back. It has been in my planning for years to get exhibits posted into this space and this project is the perfect place to start. The students created art, created math models of their art and elaborated on their learning – three examples below:

Kendall"s Math and Art Poster

mahina's math and art poster

Brianne's Math and Art poster

At the same time, most of our bike groups now have operational electric bikes! This project which took two months longer than planned (hey, who said doing real work was easy or fit neatly into a box?) had students explore everything from torque and rotational mechanics, to forces and motion, to electricity and magnetism, to air pressure, to climate change. The ultimate goal will be an auction in May with the proceeds going to a charitable cause that supports our work. The class flickr site https://flic.kr/s/aHsk1yMvRc has photos through the whole process, but here are three slides from my presentation at Deeper learning that show different stages in development. They don’t show all the formative assessments and knowledge construction that were necessary to accomplish this project, but you can certainly see the active role of the students in their work and learning:

moving from idea to construction

moving from idea to construction

learning to repair bicycles

learning to repair bicycles

looking at circuit design

looking at circuit design

Last example of “Keep it Real” is the work from our Innovative Design Technology Class. Our latest project challenged the students to propose, design, develop and complete a project of their choosing. Students projects included
researching, designing and building an athletic shoe,
3-d scanning and 3-d printing a mounted owl for curation and designing as mascot gifts
programming and wiring a raspberry Pi and stepped motors to make a camera shoot rig.
storyboarding and designing a mobile app that would gamify trash collection to increase involvement in cleaning up the community.
Some slides on that below, but what was clear was that students more than not dove in deeply and generated something of value through their interests and passions.

koa's canvas design on motion and  dance

gian's show making process

gian's shoe finished

Erika's design sketches

Erika's Hiking Bag design

These projects and the resulting student learning are not perfect, but when I look at Rob’s Rules of Rigor, I see many of the elements he defines in this work and that encourages me to “Keep it Real”

Frameworks, models and structuring learning

It’s been a few weeks since the last post, – not an indication of little happening, but more a case of a flood of activity that’s been hard to sit down and organize and share.
Certainly the photo streams that I post on Flickr have been updated regularly:

For the design class here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/121697751@N02/sets/72157646692621755/
For the MPX stem class here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/121697751@N02/sets/72157646271766017/

It’s late on a Friday already, but it’s worth sending out a few ideas about what we’ve been working on – things have been exciting and reaching some interesting points in our work.

One of the things that is clear is that in both of the classes that I’ve been working with, the need for structure around the things we’re learning is clear and fits well within our understanding of how we learn science around us – if we can develop effective, simple and applicable models of the way things behave, then it makes them easier to apply an understanding novel situations.

STEM

The big activity we have been working towards has been building electric bikes – not a ready-made kit with easy to attach parts, but the nitty-gritty and get your fingernails dirty kind of building that involves identifying parts that put together would allow a cheap, effective and creative way to provide urban transportation. In order to get to this, a fundamental understanding of electricity and magnetism are necessary so that when we are connecting these industrial grade parts we have an appreciation of things like voltage, current limits, parallel and series and their role, why wires have different gauges… Etc.

In order to set the foundational knowledge for this, we needed to have a good working model for understanding electricity. Back in my modeling experiences from the 1990s, I was introduced to CASTLE (Capacitor-Aided System for Teaching and Learning Electricity) approach to learning electricity which was developed by Melvin Steinberg of Smith College and uses a compressible fluid approach to understanding how charge flows in circuits ( a brief description of the curriculum and its rationale here:http://www.pasco.com/prodCatalog/EM/EM-8624_castle-kit/ ). I really believe in this kind of structured but constructivist approach to building an understanding of circuits, charge flow, and a functional understanding of what’s going on with electrical devices, so we’ve been using this to build our foundational knowledge as we have been unpacking our kits.

This week we reach the culminating point where the students started hooking up the parts of their electric bike kit and needed to learn everything from the correct schematics to hook it up, to stripping wire and crimping connectors to make things fit together correctly – a lot of this was new to me working with the scale of items and it was both exciting and challenging to make sure the students were able to work on these ideas. By the end of class today, Friday, two of the five groups had connected the parts together and successfully got their motors working through the controller and the throttle – success! There are more pictures of the Flickr site, but here’s a few pictures below. Next week, we get to the really challenging work – how to put these parts on a bicycle so that it is powered and can be used to transport students across our campus.

Students working with their electric motor kits

Students working with their electric motor kits

click here for a movie of a groups working motor

Another group grapples with putting together their components

Another group grapples with putting together their components

All students were required to create a schematic diagram that showed the correct connections between the components for their electric bike

All students were required to create a schematic diagram that showed the correct connections between the components for their electric bike

Defense of understanding of circuits and charge

Defense of understanding of circuits and charge

Students defending their understanding of the circuits and charge flow

Students defending their understanding of the circuits and charge flow

Innovative Design Technology

We finished the first large project and shared designs a few weeks ago, and so we wanted to give the students a few smaller challenges to give a little more variety to the design work that they have been developing. As a result, we chose a roundtable activity where we let them determine categories where design might be interesting and applicable to address real-world problems. Eight different teams ended up choosing problems with either steering wheel redesign for cars, or looking at recycling as a opportunity to think about how design could improve people’s behaviors in the process. I have attached a couple of the slide presentations in PDF format, and one of the challenges continues to be to make sure that there is good science rigor underneath the work that they are doing – in the case of their work in this round, students investigated thermodynamics, heat transfer of different materials, ergonomics as they looked out the ways in position that people hold wheels, the different kinds of plastics that exist and the ways they are recycled, and how temperature can be measured by a variety of means.

As we use our design thinking to approach problems, it becomes a really useful framework for learners to consider both what they know, how to identify a problem that needs to be solved, and a process to get to the end. We have actually looked at a couple of different models for design process – including this week how the Wright brothers attacked building the first airplane, and how engineers approach building design. The design framework becomes a means to look at problems, to think about what we know it but we don’t know, and how to quickly generate possible solutions and test them. Some pictures below as well as the presentations from this last round of work:

PDF Presentation sam audreen erika

Steering Wheel Keynote_Koa, Marshall, Sam

Prototype creation

Prototype creation

Scaling ideasFrom computer-generated models to working size

Scaling ideasFrom computer-generated models to working size

Construction with cardboard for the prototypes

Construction with cardboard for the prototypes

Opening slide from another group talking about their chair process

Opening slide from another group talking about their chair process

Students defend their chair design to the class

Students defend their chair design to the class

So much to talk about, and so I’ll try to blog more frequently over the next few weeks as we reach some culminating points in our work…

A week of construction and reflection

Well, here we are eight weeks into the semester. What are we up to these days? And for that matter, what’s on my mind about our work?

Let’s start with interacting with text for meaning. We often in education asked students to read text to acquire new terms and concepts, to expose students to different opinions and to consider different perspectives and approaches. This week in the design class the students were reading some different articles on the importance of ergonomics as they go through the process of designing, prototyping and testing their chair designs.
As I was looking through their notes, there was a wide gap between some students and others. As I was thinking about the role that these notes played, I realized I was having the students take the notes to deepen their understanding of the field, but I wasn’t really having them interact with their own thinking enough. Below are a couple of pictures of work I considered exemplary because they show students not just taking down ideas, but organizing, reflecting and sketching to try and deepen their meaning.

Matt's Sketches on good ergonomics

Matt’s Sketches on good ergonomics

notice Samantha's interaction with her own text

notice Samantha’s interaction with her own text

some of samantha's notes

some of samantha’s notes

notice how matt organizes through color and offsetting text

notice how matt organizes through color and offsetting text

There are certainly many ways to go from this initial data mining activity to more meaning. I realized I wasn’t doing enough to have them consider their own work, so I asked them to go back through their notes and highlight three important concepts and two areas where they felt that they didn’t really understand the ideas fully and annotate those in a way so that we could talk about what they learned and what they still have questions about. I also debated whether having them do a think pair share activity would be helpful so they could talk about that – I plan to have them do that when they come back together with me next class period. All of this is tied to working towards creating a more reflective process in their learning. Their blogs are another element in doing this.

As a part of the design class we have been working on re-designing the student chair experience. They have created designs in sketch up make:

Screen Shot 2014-09-30 at 3.40.41 PM

Screen Shot 2014-09-30 at 3.39.44 PM

Screen Shot 2014-09-30 at 3.39.19 PM

They have been working on printing these in our 3-D printers, which added another layer of technology to this project. The last step is to create a full scale prototype out of cardboard. I realize that most of them have not made a full model out of cardboard before so to get them warmed up, we had them research ways to work with cardboard and then pick a small-scale project to build from the following website: http://www.ikatbag.com/2011/03/how-to-work-with-cardboard.html

Today they showcased their constructions which took about an hour and a half of class time:

mini top hat

mini top hat

hinged gift box

hinged gift box

sabers and swords

sabers and swords

top hat design - love the aesthetics

top hat design – love the aesthetics

mini top hat

mini top hat

dragon boat

dragon boat

alien space ship (the inside was detailed as well)

alien space ship (the inside was detailed as well)

top hat with examples of ways to adhere edges

top hat with examples of ways to adhere edges

so for them, the next step now is to build the chair out of cardboard – more to come on that activity…

**********************************************
The 10th grade MPX students have still been exploring issues around transportation, but we’ve also been trying to understanding the kinematic equations of motion which are part of our physics content as well as a deeper conversation about motion in transportation. One of these sidebar projects I’ve had them working on is building a catapult by first converting the design into orthographic representations, building a one quarter scale model out of chopsticks with the ultimate goal of building the catapults, which we will start tomorrow. There’s many layers to this particular activity – working with the mathematics of scaling, attention to detail around design and construction, understanding how we move from concept to design to construction and central to the core content, the physics of projectiles… The pictures below show the scale models that the students completed which took a couple of hours of class time between creating the schematics which I showed in my last blog, and the final products you see below:

IMG_5512

IMG_5546

IMG_5547

careful measurements

careful measurements

finishing touches

finishing touches

attention to detail

attention to detail

competed 1/4 catapult scale models

competed 1/4 catapult scale models

construction of scale models

construction of scale models

Hopefully by the next time I create a blog post, we’ll see examples of their final product work. Tomorrow we pull out the power tools and let them have at the full construction! Speaking of which, our ninth graders just started working on their first construction which is building tables that they will be using to do their full scale aquaponics constructions on during the course of the year:

engineering: from design to construction

engineering: from design to construction

mpx 9 construction team

mpx 9 construction team

working in our make-shift lanai shop

working in our make-shift lanai shop

When we say we believe in constructivism, we really get our hands dirty!

On the design process, iteration and feedback

Over the past 2 weeks, we have been working on a design challenge on improving student chairs (brief posted last blog).

Learners have looked into empathy by interviewing and observing MPI students in chairs across campus.

From that they have defined the problem more clearly. They have identified a set of design problems to address: hardness of seats, movable writing surface, greater mobility, flexible back rests…just a small sampling…

This past week was spent on the ideation phase – coming up with ideas on the design. The learners first started sketching ideas in their book, then took those ideas and scaled them up for a feedback loop with other members of the class – you can see pictures of this below. This kind of activity really serves two critical functions. First, it provides an opportunity for learners to assess their own thinking about what a quality drawing should have, and what strengths and improvements they can recommend to someone else. It also gives the receiver of this information opportunity to embrace feedback that is both supportive and helpful so that they can improve their own work. This kind of structured class activity builds agency in learners as they learn to see each other as a means to improve their work, and therefore increases the importance of conversation and critical thinking in our class. The next step will involve them editing these drawings to include the feedback and to reflect on the importance of this kind of formative strengthening of their work.

Some of Kris's ideas on share design in his sketchbook

Some of Kris’s ideas on share design in his sketchbook

Some of Samantha's quick sketches of chair ideas

Some of Samantha’s quick sketches of chair ideas

Feedback loop in progress

Feedback loop in progress

Students getting feedback

Students getting feedback

The learners also researched the field of ergonomics. instead of giving them an assigned reading, they created a database of articles, websites, information briefs all of the topic of ergonomics. we did a thinking routine protocol that asked the learners to share their information and come up with 12 deep questions about their reading – we will follow up on Tuesday with time to pick out the most important questions we need to understand as a part of our study.

A few of the websites students found and described regarding ergonomics

A few of the websites students found and described regarding ergonomics

The other activity we did was to start building the skills around using Sketchup Make. Learners completed a series of tutorials that allowed them to understand the basic ways to use the toolbar in the program, and understand how to build and subtract material and a virtual space. they will actually have a design quiz next week where they need to model a specific object. Last year the group needed to design a coffee cup. This year’s challenge is a surprise!

Designing with sketchup

Designing with sketchup

Working with sketchup make

Working with sketchup make

So, next week we move on to the phase of prototyping after we create a virtual version of their design using Sketchup Make. Once they have a design completed, they will print it in our 3-D printers. Once this completed that, they will build a full-scale model using cardboard. once that’s completed, a judging panel will test their designs and give one more round of feedback.

Laying the Foundation

Well here we are already more than two weeks into the start of the new year. Something new for me this year – I am teaching two different classes: 10th grade STEM for our integrated Mid-Pacific eXploratory (MPX) and a new course that is just starting this year which is Innovative Design Technology – a one year course focusing on the design process and wrapping in rigorous science content. I am co-teaching this class with my friend and colleague Lori Nishiguchi – we each have one section of this course.

As a result, I’m going to blog in this space for both courses – sometimes separately, sometimes, like today, a general summary of what both classes have been up to. As I said before the intent of this blog is to both inform about what we are doing in class, but I also use it as a space for me to share the work we do, the decision-making and rationale behind the kinds of efforts we make, and broader questions about education and the future of learning. Hopefully if you read this, something here will resonate for you.

So here are a few highlights from the past couple of weeks.

In the design class,

the most engaging work we’ve done so far was running the Stanford d.school crash design course. Designed to take no more than an hour and a half, it is a quick iterative process that walks the participants through the design process beginning to end in the midst of trying to redesign a gift giving experience. Lori and I ran this on the second full day of class and it gave us both a chance to see how pacing, tempo and group dynamics were in our class, as well as a means to introduce the underlying foundation of good design principles that we plan to rely on for the next eight months. If you’re not familiar with their work, the homepage for their d.school is here. I’ve embedded the design course video below in case it would be interesting to look at. Below that are a few pictures from the activity in our class which I think does a nice job showing the engagement and effort in this very quick process. What was most interesting was the debrief with the students revealed both their interest in understanding the importance of getting to the empathy and the value of understanding the end-user experience, as well as the high pressure nature of quick prototyping and iterative design.

Students doing the design process - going for empathy

Students doing the design process – going for empathy

Students doing the design process - going for empathy

Students doing the design process – going for empathy

Students doing the design process - going for empathy

Students doing the design process – going for empathy

Students doing the design process - going for empathy

Students doing the design process – going for empathy

Students doing the design process - ideating

Students doing the design process – ideating

Students doing the design process - pro typing

Students doing the design process – pro typing

I’ve created a Flickr page that will host all of the pictures as we take some during the school year – that is located here.

We’ve now launched into our first full design project which is redesigning all or some feature of a standard school student chair. Students have already gone out and interviewed their “clients” and have come up with some issues that they are looking to try and address and are now asked to design some sketches of what might solve the problem for students. The full design brief is pasted below.

Chair design Challenge

In The MPX 10 STEM Class,

we have started with initial activities to lay the foundation for our year-long project in investigating urban transportation. The ultimate goal is really four steps: students being able to build and take apart bikes, students being able to design and build an electric bike from a standard bike frame, students designing a payload system for their electric bike to accomplish a course challenge, and the culminating set of activities around designing a more fully thought out urban system for transportation.
Although this set of challenges will be ongoing during the year, we will be doing breakaway work in a variety of other smaller projects and activities – both to create some other learning opportunities as well as to make sure our core content is covered in physics and algebra two. We spent the last week going back to some mathematics work around linear equations, and investigating constant motion which lends itself nicely to the beginning conversation around moving bikes as well as exploring linear functions and their modeling capabilities in the real world. A few pictures below show students white boarding, conducting experiments, and actually taking apart the battery-powered cars to investigate the way by which the batteries stored energy turns into motion.

Students Whiteboarding

Students Whiteboarding

Running a motion experiment

Running a motion experiment

analyzing data

analyzing data

Sketching out the inside of a battery powered car

Sketching out the inside of a battery powered car


Just like the design class, I’ll be keeping a Flickr account with a full set of photos here. The next blog posts will be more philosophical, but this was a good way to get started with year and what we’ve been working on. Last attachments for this post: the syllabi for the two courses which outline the main content areas, pedagogical practices, and assessment that we will be using in the courses.

MPX10 Stem 2014-15 Syllabus
Hines Design Technology Fall2014 Syllabus
E Kūlia Kākou
Let’s strive and aspire together